Bibliografia e structurată pe următoarele domenii:
Arhiva cu texte poate (exceptând câteva cărți) poate fi descărcată apăsând pe imaginea de mai jos:
Natura capitalului, funcții de producție
1.
Braun E., 2017, The theory of capital as a
theory of capitalism, Journal of Institutional Economics, 13, 305-325
2.
Humphrey T. H., 1997, Algebraic production
functions and their uses before Cobb-Douglas, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Economic Quarterly, 83, 51-83
3.
Lewin P., Cachanovsky N., 2018, Substance and
semantics: the question of capital, Journal of Economic Behavior and
Organization, 150, 423-431
4.
Mishra S. K., A brief history of production
functions, Working Paper Series SocialScience Research Network (SSRN), http://ssrn.com/abstract=1020577
Interacționism simbolic
5. Blumer H., 1989, Symbolic interactionism –
Perspective and Method, University of California Press, Berkeley, cota BCU
32/E16.S4
6. Cordoneanu F., 2014, Identitary character
and social hypostases of Christian-Orthodx feminity, Procedia – Social and Behavioral
Sciences 137, 205-2010
7. Denzin N. K., 2004, Symbolic
interactionism, în Flick U., E. von Kardoff, I. Steinke (editori), A Companion
to Qualitative Research, SAGE
Publications, London, 81-87
8. Fine G. A., 1993, The sad demise,
mysterious disappearance, and glorious triumph of symbolic interactions, Annual
review of sociology, 19, 61-87
9. Jameson F., 1981, The political
unconscious – Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act, Cornell University Press,
Cambridge, cota BCU II 280621
10. Lewis J. D., 1976, The classic American
pragmatists as forerunners to symbolic interactionism, The Sociological
quarterly, 17, 347-359
11. Murray,
E., 1999, Politica și utilizarea
simbolurilor, Ed. Polirom, Iași, cota BCU 316/B59.S4
12. Surdulescu R., 2006, The raping of
identity – Studies on physical and symbolic violence, Institutul European,
Iași, cota BCU I 158945
Capital simbolic
13. Bourdieu
P., R. Nice, 1980, The production of belief: contribution to an economy of
symbolic goods, Media, Culture and Society, 2, 261-293
14. Burton
Upananda, Paragahawewab H., 2011, Creating culturally sustainable
agri-environmental schemes, Journal of Rural Studies, 27, 95-104
15. De
Clercq D., Voronov M., 2009, The role of cultural and symbolic capital in
entrepreneurs’ ability to meet expectations about conformity and innovation,
Journal of Small Business Management, 47, 398-420
16.
Drăgan I. și colab., 1998, Construcția simbolică a câmpului
electoral, Institutul European, Iași.
17. Fuller
T., Tian Y., 2006, Social and symbolic capital and responsible
entrepreneurship: and empirical investigation of SME narratives, Journal of
Business Ethics, 67, 287-304 [figura 1, foarte bun]
18.
Hariuc C., E. Banciu, 2006, Comunicarea politică, Ed. Ars
Docendi, București
19. Steinmetz
G., 2006, Bourdieu’s Disavowal of Lacan: Psychoanalytic Theory and the Concepts
of “Habitus” and “Symbolic Capital”, Constellations, 13, 445-464
Teoria semnalizării - pentru explicarea apariției capitalului simbolic
20. Balliet
D., Tybur J. M., Van Lange P. A. M., 2016, Functional interdependence theory:
an evolutionary account of social situations, Personality and Social Psychology
Review, 21, 361-388
21. Bliege
Bird R., E. A. Smith, Signaling theory, strategic interaction and symbolic
capital, Current Anthropology, 46, 221-248
22. Chang
C.-W., Chuang C.-M., 2017, Re-interpreting signaling with systems thinking: a
concept for improving decision-making quality, Syst Pract Action Res, DOI
10.1007/s11213-017-9429-4
23. Connely
B. L., Certo S. T., Ireland R. D., Reutzel C. R., 2011, Signaling theory: a
review and assessment, Journal of Management, 37, 39-67
24. Darimont
C. T., Codding B. F., Hawkes K., 2017, Why men trophy hunt, Biol. Lett., 13,
20160909, http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0909
25. De
Nardo M., Brooks J. S., Klinsky S., Wilson C., 2017, Social signals and
sustainability: ambiguity about motivations can affect status perceptions of
efficiency and curtailment behaviors, Environ Syst Decis, 37, 184-197
26. Jancenelle
V. E., Javalgi R. R. G., Cavusling E., 2018, The role of economic and normative
signals in international prosocial crowdfunding : an illustration using
market orientation and psychological capital, International Business Review,
27, 208-217
27. Kuhn,
S. L., 2014, Signaling theory and technologies of communication in the
paleolithic, Biol Theory, 9, 42-50
28. Pham
M. N., Barbaro N., Mogliski J. K., Shackelford T. K., Zeigler-Hill V., 2017,
Post-fight respect signals valuations of opponent’s fighting performance,
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 407-417
29. Przepiorka
W, Berger J., Signaling theory evolving: signals and signs of trusworthiness in
social exchange, In: Jann B and Przepiorka W (eds) Social Dilemmas,
Institutions and the Evolution of Cooperation. Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg,
373–392
30. Pyysiainen
I, Haueser M., The origins of religion: evolved adaptation or by-product ?
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 104-109
31. Sosis
R., 2006, Religious behaviors, badges, and bans: Signaling theory and the
evolution of religion, în McNamara,
P. (editor) Where God and Science Meet: How Brain and Evolutionary Studies
Alter our Understanding of Religion (I – III (Vol. I)), Praeger, 61– 86
32. Sosis
R., Kress H. C., Boster J. S., 2007, Scars for war: evaluating alternative
signaling explanations for cross-cultural variance in ritual costs, Evolution
and Human Behavior, 28, 234-247
33. Winegard
B., Winegard B., Reynolds T., Geary D. C., Baumeister R. F., 2017, One’s Better
Half: Romantic Parteners Function as Social Signals, Evolutionary Psychological
Science, 3, 294-305
Capital relațional, încredere (parte a celui social, a se vedea și Fueller și Tian 2006 la Capital Simbolic).
34. Castelfranchi
C., Falcone R., Marzo F., 2006, Being trusted in a social network:Trust as relational
capital, Lecture Notes on Artificial Intelligence (LNAI)
35. Frey
V., 2016, Boosting trust by facilitating communication: a model of trustee
investments in information sharing, Rationality and Society, 29, 471-503 [model cantitativ]
36. Przepiorka
W., Norbutas L., Corten R., 2017, Order without law: reputation promotes
cooperation in a cryptomarket for illegal drugs, European Sociological Review,
33, 752-764
37. Shim
Y. S., 2017, Investigating the determinants and endogenous influences of environmental
reputation, Disseration Theses, Southern Illinois University Carbondale,
disponibil la http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/dissertations/1459/
38. Sosis
R., 2005, Does religion promote trust ? The role of signaling, reputation, and
punishment, Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 1, 1-30
Capital spiritual
39. Barro,
R. J., McCleary R. M. , 2003, Religion and Economic Growth across Countries,
American Sociological Review, 68, 760-781
40. Bomberg
E., Hague A., 2018, Faith-based climate action in Christian
congregations : mobilisation and spiritual resources, Local Environment,
23, 582-596
41. Bosch
M., Torralba F., Gracia C., 2013, Aristotle and spiritual capital, Ramon Llull
Journal of Applied Ethics, 4, 67-86
42. Bowler
E., 2014, Religion and Peace: A case study on Mennonite peace initiatives in
Colombia, Master Theses, Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, http://m.library2.smu.ca/bitstream/handle/01/25800/bowler_erica_masters_2014.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
43. Chuvieco
E., Burgui M., 2016, Impact of religious affiliation on ethical values in
Spanish environmental activists, Religions, 7, doi:10.3390/rel7050046
44. Cordier
R., Milbourn B., Martin R., Buchanan A., Chung D., Speyer R., 2017, A
systematic review evaluating the psychometric properties of measures of social
inclusion, PLOS One, 12(6):e0179109. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone
.0179109
45. Dhiman
S., Marques J. 2017, Spirituality and Sustainability – New Horizons and
Exemplary approaches, Springer, https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-34235-1
46. Finke
R., Spiritual Capital: definitions, applications, and new frontiers, Penn State
University
47. Garner
A., 2003, Spirituality and Sustainability, Conservation Biology, 17, 946
48. Grussendorf
S., 2016, Bourdieu’s field, capital and habitus in religion, Journal for the
Sociological Integration of Religion and Society, 6, 1-13
49. Huang
Y., 2016, Religious involvement as social capital: its nature and implications
for integration in Britain, PhD Theses, University of Manchester, https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/files/54586318/FULL_TEXT.PDF
50. Lawson
J. T., 2012, The emergent sea of nature and religion: a study of faith-based
responses to issues on environmental sustainability, PhD Theses, Deakin
University
51. Marsh
C., 2010, Orthodox spiritual capital and Russian reform, în Berger P. L., Redding G. (editori), The Hidden
Form of Capital: Spiritual Influences in Societal Progress, Anthem Press,
London, 171-189
52. Maselko
J., Hughes C., Cheney R., 2011, Religious social capital: its measurement and
utility in the study of the social determinants of health, Soc. Sci. Med, 71,
759-767
53. Montemaggi
F. E. S., 2011, The enchanting dream of “Spiritual Capital”, Implicit Religion,
14, 67-86
54. Morrison
M., Duncan R., Parton K., 2015, Religion does matter for climate change
attitudes and behavior, PLoS ONE, 10(8): e0134868,
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134868
55. Murray
G., Agyare A., 2018, Religion and perceptions of community-based conservation
in Ghana, West Africa, PLoSONE 13(4): e0195498, https://doi.org/10.1371/j
ournal.pone.0195498
56. Noghiu
A. A., 2015, Spiritual capital theory: a grounded theory based analysis of SCT
and its policy application, PhD Theses, University of Delaware, http://dspace.udel.edu/bitstream/handle/19716/17578/2015_NoghiuAlain_PhD.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
57. Selhorst A. J. C., 2015, Fear, Honor,
Interest: An Analysis of Russia’s Operations in the Near Abroad (2007-2014),
Report, OMB No. 0704-0188, http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/1001855.pdf
58. Sluka R. D., Kaonga M., Weatherley J., Anand
V., Bosu D., Jackson C., 2011, Christians, biodiversity conservation and
poverty alleviation: a potential synergy ? Biodiversity, 12, 108-115
59. Ungvari-Zrinyi I., 2014, Spirituality as
motivation and perspective for a socially responsible entrepreneurship, World
Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sust. Development, 10, 4-15
60. Weatherley-Singh
J., Branco T., Felgueiras M., 20015, The greening of the EU? A Christian assessment of the EU’s environmental
policies for biodiversity and nature, în Chaplin J., Wilton G. “God and
the EU”, 21 pagini, https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781317439219/chapters/10.4324%2F9781315694313-26
61. Wong,
S., 2013, Using religious capital to
alleviate poverty? A case study of cross-border migration in south China. In G.
Carbonnier (Ed.), International Development Policy: Religion and
Development(pp.174-191). Geneva: Graduate Institute of Geneva.
Tipologia valoarilor capitalului natural
62. Arias-Arevallor
P., Martin-Lopez B., Gomez-Baggethun E., 2017, Exploring intrinsic,
instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of
social-ecological systems, Ecology and Society, 22, 43, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09812-220443
63. Arias-Arevalo
P., Gomez-Baggethun E., Martin-Lopez B., Perez-Rincon M., 2018, Widening the
evaluative space for ecosystem services : a taxonomy of plural values and
valuation methods, 27, 29-53
64. Bartkowski,
B., 2017, Existence value, biodiversity, and the utilitarian dilemma, Leipzig,
(UFZ Discussion Papers 2/2017). URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-51155-0
65. Chan
K., Balvanera P., Benessaiah K., Chapman M., Díaz S., Gómez-Baggethun E., Gould
R. K., Hannahs N., Jax K., Klain S. C., Luck G. W., Martin-Lopez B., Muraca B.,
Norton B., Ott K., Pascual U., Satterfield T., Tadaki M., Taggart J., Nancy T.,
2016, Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment, Proc Natl Acad
Sci U S A, 113, 1462-1465
66. Deliege
G., Neteleers S., 2015, Should biodiversity be useful ? Scope and limits of
ecosystem services as an argument for biodiversity conservation, Environmental
Values, 24, 165-182
67. Pascual
U., Balvanera P., Díaz S., Pataki G., Roth E., Stenseke M., Watson R. T.,
Dessane B. E., M. Islar, Kelemen, E., Maris V., Quaas M., Subramanian S. M.,
Wittmer H., Adlan A., Ahn S., Al-Hafedh Y.S., Amankwah E., Asah S. T., Berry
P., Bilgin A., Breslow S.J., Bullock C., Cáceres D., Daly-Hassen H., Figueroa
E., Golden C. D., Gómez-Baggethun E., González-Jiménez D., Houdet J., Keune H.,
Kumar R., Ma K., May P. H., Mead A., O’Farrell P., Pandit R., Pengue W.,
Pichis-Madruga R., Popa F., Preston S., Pacheco-Balanza D., Saarikoski H., Strassburg B. B., van den Belt M., Verma M.,
Wickson F., Yagi N., 2017, Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES
approach, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 26, 7-16
68. Schroter
M, van Oudenhoven P. E., 2016, Ecosystem services go beyond money and markets:
reply to Sivertown, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31, 333-334
Costuri de tranzacție
69. Barua
M., Bhagvat S. A., Jadhav S., 2013, The hidden dimensions of human-wildlife
conflict: health impacts, opportunity and transaction cosists, Biodiversity
Conservation, 157, 309-316
70. Garrick
D., Whiten S. M., Coggan A., 2013, Understading the evolution and performance
of water markets and allocation policy: a transaction costs analysis framework,
Ecological Economics, 88, 195-205
71. Marshall
G. R., 2013, Transaction costs, collective action and adaptation in managing
complex social-ecological systems, 2013, Ecological Economics, 88, 185-194
72. Naidoo
R., Balmford A., Ferraro P. J., Polasjy S., Ricketts T. H., Rouget M., 2006, Integrating
economic costs into conservation planning, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21,
681-687
73. Perez-Blanco
C. D., Gutierrez-Martin C., 2017, Buy me a river : use of multi-attribute
non-linear utility functions to address overcompensation in agricultural water
buyback, Agricultural Water Management, 190, 6-20
74. Phan
Dang T.-H., Brouwer R., Hoang L. P., Davidson M. D., 2017, A comparative study
of transaction costs of payments for forest ecosystem services in Vietnam,
Forest Policy and Economics, 80, 141-149
75. Pujol
J., Raggi M., Viaggi D., 2006, The potential impact of markets for irrigation
water in Italy and Spain : a comparison of two study areas, The Australian
Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 50,361-380
76. Rey
D., Perez-Blanco C. D., Escriva-Bou A., Girard C., Veldkamp T. I. E., 2018,
Role of economic instruments in water allocation reform : lessons from
Europe, International Journal of Water Resources Development, https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2017.1422702
77. Shahab
S., Clinch J. P., O’Neill, 2018, Accounting for transaction costs in planning
policy evaluation, Land Use Policy, 70, 263-272
Co-producție -aspecte generale
78. Auh S., Bell S. J., McLeod C. S., Shih E.,
2007, Co-production and customer Loyalty in financial services, Journal of
Retailing, 83, 359-370
79. Brandsen
T, Pestoff V, 2006, Co-production, the
third sector and the delivery of public services: an introduction, Public
Management Review, 8, 493-501
80. Osborne S. P., Radnor Z., Strokosh K.,
2016, Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: a suitable
case for treatment ? Public Management Review, 18, 639-653
81. Toots M., McBride K., Kalvet T., Krimmer
R, 2017, Open data as enabler of public service co-creation: exploring the
drivers and barries, in P. Parycek și N. Edelma (editori), Proceedings of the 7th
international conference for e-democracy and open government, Danube University
Krems, Austria, 2017. pp. 102-112
82. Verschuere B., Brandsen T., Pestoff V.,
2012, Co-production: the state of the art in research and the future agenda,
Voluntas, 23, 1083-1101
Co-producția serviciilor ecosistemice
83. Gissi
E., Garramone V., 2018, Learning on ecosystem services co-production in
decision-making from role-playing simulation: comparative analysis from
Southeast Europe, Ecosystem Services, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.025
84. Kamphorst D. A., Bouwma I. M., Selnes T.
A., 2017, Societal engagement in Natura 2000 sites. A comparative analysis of
the policies in three areas in England, Denmark and Germany, Land Use Policy,
61, 379-388
85. Miller C. A., Wyborn C., 2018,
Co-production in global sustainability: Histories and theories, Environmental
Science and Policy, ciornă corectată disponibilă on-line, https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.016
86. Moyer J. M, Sinclair A. J., Spaling H.,
2012, Working for God and sustainability: the activities of faith-based
organisations in Kenya, Voluntas, 23, 959-992
87. Outeiro L., Ojea E., Rodrigues J. G.,
Himes-Cornell A., Belgrano A., Liu Y., Cabecinha E., Pita C., Macho G.,
Sebastian V., 2017, The role of non-natural capital in the co-production of
marine ecosystem services, International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem
Services & Management, 13, 35-50
88. Palomo I., Felipe-Lucia M. R., Bennet E.
M., Martin-Lopez B., Pascual U., Felipe-Lucia M. R., Bennet E. M., Martin-Lopez
B., Pascual U., Disentangling the Pathways and Effects of Ecosystem Service
Co-Production, Advances in Ecological Research, 54, 245-283
89. Raymond C. M., Giusti M., Barthel S.,
2017, An embodied perspective on the co-production of cultural ecosystem
services: toward embodied ecosystems, Journal of Environmental Planning and
Management, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2017.1312300
90. Smith A. C., Harrison P. A., Perez Soba
M., Archaux F., Blicharska M., Egoh B. N., Eros T., Fabrega Domenech N., Gyorgy
A. I., Haines-Young R., Li S., Lommelen E., Meiresonne L., Miguel Ayala L.,
Mononen L., Simpson G., Stange E., Turkelboom F., Uiterwijk M., Veerkamp C. J.,
Wyllie de Echeverria V., 2017, How natural capital delivers ecosystems
services: a typology derived from a systematic review, Ecosystem Services, 26,
111-126
91. Trischler J., Charles M., 2018, The
Application of a Service Ecosystems Lens to Public Policy Analysis and Design:
Exploring the Frontiers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing In-Press. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.17.060
Co-producție a planurilor, politicilor și programelor pentru dezvoltare
durabilă
92. Berg M., Lidskog R., 2018a, Deliberative
democracy meets democratised science: a deliberative systems aproach to global
environmental governance, Environmental Politics, 27, 1-20
93. Berg M., Lidskog R., 2018b, Pathways to
deliberative capacity: the role of the IPCC, Climatic Change, 148, 11-24
94. Bloesch, J., D. Gutcknecht, Virgil
Iordache 2005, Hydrology and Limnology - Another Boundery in the Danube River
Basin, IHP VI - Technical documents in hydrology, UNESCO, Paris
95. Esguerra A., Beck S., Lidskog
R.,Stakeholder Engagement in the Making: IPBES Legitimization Politics, Global
Environmental Politics, 17, 59-76
96. Goldman M. J., Turner M. D., Daly M.,
2018, A critical political economy of human dimensions of climate change:
epistemology, ontology, and ethics, WIREs Clim Change, 2018;9: e526, https://doi.org/10.1 002/wcc.526
97. Hewett M. A., 2004, Michel Foucault:
power/knowledge and epistemological prescriptions, Honors Theses. Paper 534,
University of Richmond, UR Scholarship Repository
98. Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., O’Brien, G.,
2005. Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustain. Dev. 13,
38–52
99. Kruger C., Caiado R. G. G., Franca S. L.
B., Quelhas O. L. G., 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production, 191, 400-416
100.
Maesse
J., 2017, The elitism dispostif: hierarchization, discourses of excellence and
organizational change in European economics, High Educ, 73, 909-927
101.
Mauser
W., Klepper G., Rice M., Schmalzbauer S. S., Hackmann H., Leemans R., Moore H.,
2013, Transdisciplinary global change research: the co-creation of knowledge
for sustainability, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 420-431
102.
Monod
J.-C., 2017, Between post-truth and epistemocracy: positioning a democratic
politics, Eurozine, 9 pages, https://www.eurozine.com/between-post-truth-and-epistemocracy-positioning-a-democratic-politics/
103.
Montana
J., 2017, Accommodating consensus and diversity in environmental knowledge
production: achieving closure through typologies in IPBES, Environmental Science
& Policy, 68, 20-27
104.
Partelow
S., 2016, Coevolving Ostrom’s social-ecological systems (SES) framework and
sustainability science: four key co-benefits, Sustainability Science, 11,
399-410
105.
Partelow
S., Winkler K. J., 2016, Interlinking ecosystem services and Ostrom’s framework
through orientation in sustainability research, Ecology and Society, 21, 27, http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08524-210327
106.
Plummer
R., Baird J., Armitage D., Bodin O., Schultz L., 2017, Diagnosing adaptive
comanagement across multiple cases, Ecology and Society, 22, 19, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09436-220319
107.
Tuihedur
Rahman H. M., Saint Ville A. S., Song A. M., Po J. Y. T., Berthet E., Brammer
J. R., Brunet N. D., Jayaprkash L. G., Lowitt K. N., Rastogi A., Reed G.,
Hickey G. M., 2017, A framework for analyzing institutional gaps in natural
resource governance, International Journal of the Commons, 11, 823-853
108.
Sakao
T., Brambila-Macias S.. A., 2017, Do we share and understading of
transdisciplinarity in environmental sustainability research ? Journal of
Cleaner Production, 170, 1399-1443
109.
Seidl
R., Barhel R., 2017, Linking scientific disciplines: Hydrology and social
sciences, Journal of Hydrology, 550, 441-452
110.
Tejedor
G., Segalas J., Rosas-Casals M., 2018, Transdisciplinarity in higher education
for sustainability: how discourses are approached in engineering education, Journal
of Cleaner Production, 175, 29-37
111.
Tengo
M., Hill R., Malmer P., Raymond C. M., Spierenburg M., Danielsen F., Elmqvist
T., Folke C., 2017, Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond –
lessons learned for sustainability, Current Opinion in Environmental
Sustainabity, 26-27, 17-25
112.
Trencher
G., Nagao M., Chen C., Ichiki K., Sadayoschi T., Kinai M., Kamitani M.,
Nakamura S., Yamauchi A., Yarime M., 2017, Implementing sustainability
co-creation between universities and society: a typology-based understanding,
Sustainability, 9, 594, 594; doi:10.3390/su9040594
113.
Turner
II B. L., Esler K. J., Bridgewater P., Tewksbury J., Sitas N., Abrahams B.,
Chapin III S. F., Chowdhury R. R., Christie P., Diaz S., Firth P., Knapp C. N.,
Kramer J., Leemans R., Palmer M., Pietri D., Pittman J., Sarukhan J.,
Shackleton R., Seidler R., van Wilgen B., Mooney H., 2013, Socio-environmental
systems (SES) research: what have we learned and how can we use this
information in future research programs, Curent Opinion in Environmental
Sustainability, 19, 160-168
114.
Van
der Hel S., 2016, New science for global sustainability ? The
institutionalisation of knowledge co-production in Future Earth, Environmental
Science & Policy, 61, 165-175
Analiză și design instituțional, policentricitate în managementul
resurselor naturale
115.
Aligică
D. P., 2014, Institutional Diversity and Political Economy – the Ostroms and
Beyond, Oxford University Press, Oxford
116.
Ambrus
M., 2014, Legitimacy Narratives in Polycentric Water Law and Governance: The
Strategies of the Danube Commission, International Organizations Law Review,
11, 83-113
117.
Bisaro A., Roggero M., Villamayor-Tomas S.,
2018, Institutional Analysis in Climate Change Adaptation Research: A
systematic Literature Review, Ecological Economics, 151, 34-43 [figura 1]
118.
Cox M., Villamayor-Tomas S., Epstein G., Evans
L., Ban N. C., Fleischman F., Nenadovic M., Garcia-Lopez G., 2016, Synthesizing
theories of natural resource management and governance, Global Environmental
Change, 39, 45-56
119.
Faysse N., Ben Mustapha A., 2017, Finding common
ground between theories of collective action: the potential of analyses at a
meso-scale, International Journal of the Commons, 11, 928-949
120.
Fisher
M., Ocelik P., 2018, Networked Environmental Politics: New Approaches to New
Challenges, Workshop Description, ECPR Conference, https://ecpr.eu/Events/PanelDetails.aspx?PanelID=7713&EventID=121
121.
Halbe J., Pahl-Wostl C., Adamowski J., 2018, A
methodological framework to support the initiation, design and
institutionalization of participatory modeling
processes in water resources management, Journal of Hydrology, 556,
701-716
122.
Halbe J., Knuppe K., Knieper C., Pahl-Wostl C.,
2018, Towards an integrated flood management approach to address trade-offs
between ecosystem services: insights from Dutch and German Rhine, Hungarian
Tisza, and Chinese Yangtze basins, Journal of Hydrology, 559, 984-994
123.
Lee C., Lloyd P., 2016, A review of the recent
literaterature on the institutional economics analysis of the long-run
performance of nations, ISEAS Economics Working Paper No. 2016-1
124.
Iordache
V., 2008, Explorari dincolo de individualism si holism, Ed. Ars. Docendi,
Bucureşti
125.
Marshall
G. R., 2015, Polycentricity, subsidiarity and adaptive efficiency, Working
Paper, Indiana University, Bloomington, DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31625.65125
126.
McGinnis M. D., 2010a, Institutional Analysis,
Game Models, and Polycentric Governance: Contextualizing IAD via Networks of
Adjacent Action Situations, Prepared for discussion at the 2010 Annual Meeting
of the American Political Science Association, Sept. 2-5, 2010, Washington,
D.C., in Theme Panel: Institutional Analysis and Development: Development and
Promise; revised version of a paper presented at the Institutional Analysis and
Development Symposium,School of Public Affairs, University of Colorado Denver,
April 9-10, 2010.
127.
McGinnis M. D., 2010b, Building a programme for
institutional analysis of social-ecological systems: a review of revisions to
the SES framework. Working Paper. Workshop in Political Theory and Policy
Analysis, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
128.
McGinnis M. D., Ostrom E., 2014, SES framework:
initial changes and continuing challenges, Ecology and Society, 19, 30, http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06387-190230
129.
Meijers E., Hollander K., Hoogerbrugge M., 2012,
A strategic knowledge and research agenda on polycentric metropolitan areas.
The Hague: European Metropolitan network Institute
130.
Oberlack C., Boillat S., Brönnimann S., Gerber
J.-D., Heinimann A., Ifejika Speranza C., Messerli P., Rist S., Wiesmann U.,
2018. Polycentric governance in telecoupled resource systems, Ecology and
Society, 23, 16. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09902-230116
131.
Ostrom E., Cox M., 2010, Moving beyond panaceas:
a multi-tiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological analysis, Environmental
Conservation, 34, 451-463
132.
Ostrom E., 2007, Guvernarea bunurilor comune:
evoluția instituțiilor pentru
acțiunea colectivă, Polirom, Iași (Cambridge University Press 1990)
133.
Pahl-Wostl C., 2017, An evolutionary perspective
on water governance: from understanding to transformation, Water Resour Manage,
31, 2917-2932
134.
Pahl-Wostl C., 2017, Governance of the
water-energy-food security nexus: a multi-level coordination challenge,
Environmental Science and Policy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.017
135.
Roggero M., Thiel A., 2017, Adapting as usual:
integrative and segregative institutions shaping adaptation to climate change
in local public administrations, Journal of Institutional Economics, 14,
557-578
136.
Suškevičs M., Hahn T., Rodela R., Macura B.,
Pahl-Wost, C., 2018, Learning for social-ecological change: A qualitative review
of outcomes across empirical literature in natural resource management. Journal
of Environmental Planning and Management, 61, 1085-1112
137.
Thiel A., 2015, Constitutional state structure
and scalar re-organization of natural resource governance: the transformation
of polycentric water governance in Spain, Portugal and Germany, Land Use
Policy, 45, 176-188
138.
Thiel A., 2017, The scope of polycentric
governance analysis and resulting challenges, Journal of Self-Governance and
Management Economics, 5, 52-82
139.
Thiel A., Egerton C., 2011, Rescaling of
resource governance as institutional change: the case of water governance in
Portugal, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54, 383-402
140.
Thiel A., Schleyer C., Plieninger T., 2012,
Wolves are Mobile, While Fruit Trees are not! How Characteristics of Resources
and Supranational Regulatory Frameworks Shape the Provision of Biodiversity and
Ecosystem Services in Germany, Env. Pol. Gov., 22, 189-204
141.
Thiel A., Adamseged M. E., Baake C., 2015, Evaluating
an instrument for institutional crafting: how Ostrom’s social-ecological
systems framework is applied, Environmental Science & Policy, 53, 152-164
142.
Thiel A., 2016, The polycentricity approach and
the research challenges confronting environmental governance, THESys Discussion
Paper No. 2016-1, Humboldt -Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Pp. 1-27.
edoc.hu-berli n.de/series/thesysdiscpapers
143.
Van Zeben J. A.W., 2013, Research agenda for a
polycentric European Union, Ostrom
Workshop Working Paper Series W13 -13
144.
Van Zeben, J. A. W., 2018, Polycentricity,
Routledge Handbook of the Study of the Commons, Hudson, Rosenbloom, Cole (eds.)
(Routledge, Forthcoming). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3126699
145.
Villamayor-Tomas S., Fleischman F. D.,
2014, From Sandoz to Salmon:
Conceptualizing resource and institutional dynamics in the Rhine watershed
through the SES framework, International Journal of the Commons, 8, 361-395
146.
Whaley
L., Weatherhead E. K., 2014, An integrated approach to analyzing (adaptive)
comanagement using “politicized” IAD Framework, Ecology and Society, 19,
“politicized” IAD Framework, Ecology and Society, 19, http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06177-190110
147.
Zikos D., Thiel A., 2013, Action research’s
potential to foster institutional change for urban water management, Water, 5,
356-378
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu